We’re only four days away from the anointing of the messiah. On Tuesday, Jan 20 Barack Obama will be sworn in as President of the United States. The mountains will crumble and the skies will open. A dove will descend on Obama’s head or perhaps on the Lincoln Bible that he will use to pledge his oath. If it were June or July our president-elect might even emerge from the Potomac River, symbolizing the nation’s washing away of the Bush Administration.
Well, maybe not.
Sure I am being facetious. Yet, even the most objective observer must confess that the adoration of Obama has reached dizzying heights, even redefining the term “cult of personality”. Think I am exaggerating:
$ After hearing that Obama was a Spider-Man fan growing up, Marvel Comics decided to devote an issue to the webbed super hero and the president-elect. Obama is featured on the cover giving Spidey a thumbs-up. Apparently the two even fist-bump in the issue.
$ Masonry, a society condemned by the Catholic Church, is holding an inaugural ball in honor of our president-elect. According to a press release announcing the event, on Jan 20 The William R. Singleton-Hope-Lebanon Lodge #7 of Washington D.C. will host the “first-ever Masonic Inaugural Ball in honor of President-elect, Barack Obama and Vice-President Elect Joseph Biden.” Considering that Freemasonry has existed in the U.S. since our nation’s inception, it is surprising that this is only D.C.’s first Masonic inaugural ball. (Incidentally, among the reasons the Catholic Church demands that its flock not join Freemasonry is that “theoretically and practically it undermines the Catholic and Christian faith, first in its members and through them in the rest of society, creating religious indifferentism and contempt for orthodoxy and ecclesiastical authority.”) http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09771a.htm
$ The Brooklyn Cyclones, a minor league baseball team that plays in Coney Island, will rename itself the “Baracklyn Cyclones” on June 23 to honor our president elect. The team will dress in a red, white, and blue uniform with the name Baracklyn Cyclones spread across the jersey. Fans who attend will receive an Obama bobble-head doll. What connection the president-elect has to Brooklyn to warrant this adulation is unknown . . . at least to me.
In truth, although I did not vote for Obama and I disagree with him intensely on certain issues, I feel sorry for him. With the expectations heaped upon him he cannot help but fail. The number of Americans, including those in the media, who expect him to lead us out of this “recession” is staggering. This global financial collapse has been brewing for decades and experts are as clueless as the average person as to the direction the world economy is headed. Yet, people still expect Obama to shepherd us to the promised land.
Our new president appears to be an intelligent man who will work diligently as president. In light of the executives he has selected for his administration, he seems to want a diverse group that reaches across the political spectrum. That is a welcome sign and we wish him well.
But let’s remember Psalm 145: 2-3:
“Put not your trust in princes: In the children of men, in whom there is no salvation.”
Donald Tremblay
Catholic Agenda
Catholic Agenda
Friday, January 16, 2009
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
IN NAME ONLY
If you have not read Donald Tremblay's new research about post-Vatican II you should take time out of your schedule to read it. Click Here
Backed Into a Corner
Not surprisingly the international community, and much of the media, has gone out of its way to condemn Israel for its response to the latest violence in the Gaza Strip. The short-term memory loss of these people is truly staggering. Hamas lobs rockets into Israel, but it is the state of Israel who must defend its actions. The Jewish state is lectured about “proportionate” and “measured” military responses by nations who would act similarly given the same circumstances. No sane human being enjoys the death and maiming of innocent civilians. Still, there comes a point where there is no way around these tragedies. That time is now. The Israelis are dealing with an enemy who has no desire for peace, an enemy who cares nothing for Jewish or Palestinian lives. Their sole desire is to wipe Israel off the map, regardless of who must be sacrificed in the process.
Where is the outrage against Hamas for using their Palestinian brethren as human shields? Where is the condemnation of Hamas for shooting rockets from civilian locations, such as schools and mosques? Instead Hamas’ actions are accepted as a given, while it is Israel who is accused of crimes against humanity for defending itself.
Shortly the global community led by that den of despotism and corruption–the United Nations–will call for another cease-fire so humanitarian aid can be delivered to the Palestinian people. Inevitably that aid will find its way into the hands of Hamas. And while it is being confiscated, Hamas will take advantage of the lull in the fighting to smuggle more weapons into the Gaza. It is a story that has been repeated ad nauseum.
I am not suggesting that Israel is blameless in the Arab-Israeli conflict. I have little doubt that Arab claims of second-class treatment at the hands of the Israeli government are true. However, it is difficult to sympathize with the Arab world when much of it longs to exterminate the Israeli state. If there is blame to be placed for the death and destruction in Gaza, it should rest on the soldiers of nations such as Iran and Syria– nations that support terrorist organizations like Hamas. These governments are responsible for more Arab deaths than Israel could ever inflict.
Watching the death of innocents is heart-wrenching and whatever can be done to limit this loss of life should be done. But a lethal military response is necessary. To speak of peace talks with evil murderers like Hamas is an insult to the dead–both Israeli and Palestinian.
Donald Tremblay
Where is the outrage against Hamas for using their Palestinian brethren as human shields? Where is the condemnation of Hamas for shooting rockets from civilian locations, such as schools and mosques? Instead Hamas’ actions are accepted as a given, while it is Israel who is accused of crimes against humanity for defending itself.
Shortly the global community led by that den of despotism and corruption–the United Nations–will call for another cease-fire so humanitarian aid can be delivered to the Palestinian people. Inevitably that aid will find its way into the hands of Hamas. And while it is being confiscated, Hamas will take advantage of the lull in the fighting to smuggle more weapons into the Gaza. It is a story that has been repeated ad nauseum.
I am not suggesting that Israel is blameless in the Arab-Israeli conflict. I have little doubt that Arab claims of second-class treatment at the hands of the Israeli government are true. However, it is difficult to sympathize with the Arab world when much of it longs to exterminate the Israeli state. If there is blame to be placed for the death and destruction in Gaza, it should rest on the soldiers of nations such as Iran and Syria– nations that support terrorist organizations like Hamas. These governments are responsible for more Arab deaths than Israel could ever inflict.
Watching the death of innocents is heart-wrenching and whatever can be done to limit this loss of life should be done. But a lethal military response is necessary. To speak of peace talks with evil murderers like Hamas is an insult to the dead–both Israeli and Palestinian.
Donald Tremblay
Monday, January 5, 2009
Its Alive
The science fiction genre has produced many classics, be it through literature, film, and even radio. Many of these tales are commentaries on Man’s abuse of its scientific knowledge. The narratives generally center around scientists who through dangerous experimentation create mutant life forms. In Frankenstein a scientist creates a murderous humanoid by generating life from dead tissue. In The Fly a scientist experiments on himself and creates a human-insect hybrid. More recently, although not a classic like the others, I Am Legend relates the tale of a scientist (Will Smith) who cures cancer and nearly wipes out human civilization in the process. His antidote for cancer is a mutation of the measles virus, which ultimately kills the cancer survivors or mutates them into cannibalistic, vampire-like creatures. Frightening? Sure. But not as frightening as the scientific realities we face today.
As if the ability to clone humans or create human-animal hybrids is not harrowing enough, there is word that some of the chemicals we have been dumping on our environment are mutating the male endocrine systems of the animal kingdom . . . and possibly the human kingdom as well. According to Illinois doctor Joseph Mercola, “Various studies are indicating that unregulated chemicals released into the environment are causing male animals and humans to take on feminine characteristics.” (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/01/males-of-all-species-are-becoming-more-female.aspx) How bad has it gotten? “In British lowland rivers, 50 percent of male fish were found to be growing eggs in their testes. Hermaphrodite polar bears have also been born.”
Here are a few of the chemical culprits mentioned by Dr. Mercola:
$ Phthalates -- Exposure to phthalates can lead to incomplete testicular descent in fetuses. Phthalates are found in vinyl flooring, detergents, automotive plastics, soap, shampoo, deodorants, fragrances, hair spray, nail polish, plastic bags, food packaging, garden hoses, inflatable toys, blood-storage bags, and intravenous medical tubing.
$ Nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) -- Known to be potent endocrine disrupters, these chemicals affect gene expression by turning on or off certain genes, and interfere with the way your glandular system works. They mimic the female hormone estrogen, and have been implicated as one reason behind some marine species switching from male to female.
$ Methoxychlor and Vinclozin-- An insecticide and a fungicide respectively, have been found to cause changes to male mice born for as many as four subsequent generations after the initial exposure.
Are chemicals like these responsible for the rise in human male infertility? Is it possible that these “gender-benders,” as Dr. Mercola calls them, could be responsible for what seems to be a growing homosexual population in western society?
There is a reason Pride is considered the sin from which all others are born. The hubris Adam displayed by eating from the Tree of Knowledge is the same arrogance that we exhibit when we haphazardly manipulate science. In our utilitarian world we believe that whatever can be done, should be done. Humility is in short supply. We push the envelope daily, disregarding the likelihood of unintended consequences.
How ironic would it be if we pushed ourselves into extinction?
Donald Tremblay
As if the ability to clone humans or create human-animal hybrids is not harrowing enough, there is word that some of the chemicals we have been dumping on our environment are mutating the male endocrine systems of the animal kingdom . . . and possibly the human kingdom as well. According to Illinois doctor Joseph Mercola, “Various studies are indicating that unregulated chemicals released into the environment are causing male animals and humans to take on feminine characteristics.” (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/01/males-of-all-species-are-becoming-more-female.aspx) How bad has it gotten? “In British lowland rivers, 50 percent of male fish were found to be growing eggs in their testes. Hermaphrodite polar bears have also been born.”
Here are a few of the chemical culprits mentioned by Dr. Mercola:
$ Phthalates -- Exposure to phthalates can lead to incomplete testicular descent in fetuses. Phthalates are found in vinyl flooring, detergents, automotive plastics, soap, shampoo, deodorants, fragrances, hair spray, nail polish, plastic bags, food packaging, garden hoses, inflatable toys, blood-storage bags, and intravenous medical tubing.
$ Nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) -- Known to be potent endocrine disrupters, these chemicals affect gene expression by turning on or off certain genes, and interfere with the way your glandular system works. They mimic the female hormone estrogen, and have been implicated as one reason behind some marine species switching from male to female.
$ Methoxychlor and Vinclozin-- An insecticide and a fungicide respectively, have been found to cause changes to male mice born for as many as four subsequent generations after the initial exposure.
Are chemicals like these responsible for the rise in human male infertility? Is it possible that these “gender-benders,” as Dr. Mercola calls them, could be responsible for what seems to be a growing homosexual population in western society?
There is a reason Pride is considered the sin from which all others are born. The hubris Adam displayed by eating from the Tree of Knowledge is the same arrogance that we exhibit when we haphazardly manipulate science. In our utilitarian world we believe that whatever can be done, should be done. Humility is in short supply. We push the envelope daily, disregarding the likelihood of unintended consequences.
How ironic would it be if we pushed ourselves into extinction?
Donald Tremblay
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Thanks,Nana
Grandma Bloomberg meet Grandpa Patterson.
I don’t know about you, but I’m fed up with politicians who want to legislate society into living a healthier lifestyle, always under the pretense that it “for our own good”. First our dear mayor Michael Bloomberg bans trans fats from restaurants. Then he requires fast food providers to post the caloric intake of their foods. And let’s not forget his fixation on banning smoking. It is now easier to smoke a joint in New York City than it is to smoke a cigarette . . . And no, I am not a smoker.
Now New York State Governor David Patterson has decided that he will out-grandparent Mayor Bloomberg by pushing for a “fat tax”. (http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/12/the-doctor-is-in-cyberspace.html) According to New York Daily News columnist Elizabeth Benjamin, this tax will involve an “18 percent levy on sugary drinks like non-diet soda.” New York State Health Commissioner Richard Daines openly admits that the purpose of this tax is to, in Benjamin’s words, “disincentivize sugary drinks, which research shows are the top culprit in the childhood obesity epidemic, and encourage people to return to 1970s-era levels of consumption of other, less fattening beverages like milk and water.”
Instead of worrying about our cholesterol and the size of our waistlines, our esteemed Mayor and Governor should focus on more important things, such as the following:
$ Why the MTA continues to lose hundreds of millions of dollars annually, resulting in ever rising fares paid by commuters?
$ Why it is that NYC public school teachers are forced to hold classes in hallways because of limited space? Isn’t the money generated from Lotto supposed to go towards our schools? Where instead is that money being spent?
$ What rules were bent and what “incentives” were given to the Yankees to encourage the franchise to build its new stadium in the Bronx?
Maybe if our elected officials spent more time on pressing issues such as these, they would be less inclined to worry about our vices.
Donald Tremblay
I don’t know about you, but I’m fed up with politicians who want to legislate society into living a healthier lifestyle, always under the pretense that it “for our own good”. First our dear mayor Michael Bloomberg bans trans fats from restaurants. Then he requires fast food providers to post the caloric intake of their foods. And let’s not forget his fixation on banning smoking. It is now easier to smoke a joint in New York City than it is to smoke a cigarette . . . And no, I am not a smoker.
Now New York State Governor David Patterson has decided that he will out-grandparent Mayor Bloomberg by pushing for a “fat tax”. (http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/12/the-doctor-is-in-cyberspace.html) According to New York Daily News columnist Elizabeth Benjamin, this tax will involve an “18 percent levy on sugary drinks like non-diet soda.” New York State Health Commissioner Richard Daines openly admits that the purpose of this tax is to, in Benjamin’s words, “disincentivize sugary drinks, which research shows are the top culprit in the childhood obesity epidemic, and encourage people to return to 1970s-era levels of consumption of other, less fattening beverages like milk and water.”
Instead of worrying about our cholesterol and the size of our waistlines, our esteemed Mayor and Governor should focus on more important things, such as the following:
$ Why the MTA continues to lose hundreds of millions of dollars annually, resulting in ever rising fares paid by commuters?
$ Why it is that NYC public school teachers are forced to hold classes in hallways because of limited space? Isn’t the money generated from Lotto supposed to go towards our schools? Where instead is that money being spent?
$ What rules were bent and what “incentives” were given to the Yankees to encourage the franchise to build its new stadium in the Bronx?
Maybe if our elected officials spent more time on pressing issues such as these, they would be less inclined to worry about our vices.
Donald Tremblay
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Merry Christmas
1 And it came to pass, that in those days there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that the whole world should be enrolled.
2 This enrolling was first made by Cyrinus, the governor of Syria.
3 And all went to be enrolled, every one into his own city.
4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth into Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem: because he was of the house and family of David,
5 To be enrolled with Mary his espoused wife, who was with child.
6 And it came to pass, that when they were there, her days were accomplished, that she should be delivered.
7 And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him up in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn.
8 And there were in the same country shepherds watching, and keeping the night watches over their flock.
9 And behold an angel of the Lord stood by them, and the brightness of God shone round about them; and they feared with a great fear.
10 And the angel said to them: Fear not; for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, that shall be to all the people: 7 "Her firstborn"... The meaning is, not that she had afterward any other child; but it is a way of speech among the Hebrews, to call them also the firstborn, who are the only children. See annotation Matt. 1. 25.
11 For, this day, is born to you a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord, in the city of David.
12 And this shall be a sign unto you. You shall find the infant wrapped in swaddling clothes, and laid in a manger.
13 And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly army, praising God, and saying:
14 Glory to God in the highest; and on earth peace to men of good will.
15 And it came to pass, after the angels departed from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another: Let us go over to Bethlehem, and let us see this word that is come to pass, which the Lord hath showed to us.
16 And they came with haste; and they found Mary and Joseph, and the infant lying in the manger.
17 And seeing, they understood of the word that had been spoken to them concerning this child.
18 And all that heard, wondered; and at those things that were told them by the shepherds.
19 But Mary kept all these words, pondering them in her heart. 20 And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God, for all the things they had heard and seen, as it was told unto them.
Luke 2: 1-20
Merry Christmas.
Donald Tremblay
2 This enrolling was first made by Cyrinus, the governor of Syria.
3 And all went to be enrolled, every one into his own city.
4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth into Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem: because he was of the house and family of David,
5 To be enrolled with Mary his espoused wife, who was with child.
6 And it came to pass, that when they were there, her days were accomplished, that she should be delivered.
7 And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him up in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn.
8 And there were in the same country shepherds watching, and keeping the night watches over their flock.
9 And behold an angel of the Lord stood by them, and the brightness of God shone round about them; and they feared with a great fear.
10 And the angel said to them: Fear not; for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, that shall be to all the people: 7 "Her firstborn"... The meaning is, not that she had afterward any other child; but it is a way of speech among the Hebrews, to call them also the firstborn, who are the only children. See annotation Matt. 1. 25.
11 For, this day, is born to you a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord, in the city of David.
12 And this shall be a sign unto you. You shall find the infant wrapped in swaddling clothes, and laid in a manger.
13 And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly army, praising God, and saying:
14 Glory to God in the highest; and on earth peace to men of good will.
15 And it came to pass, after the angels departed from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another: Let us go over to Bethlehem, and let us see this word that is come to pass, which the Lord hath showed to us.
16 And they came with haste; and they found Mary and Joseph, and the infant lying in the manger.
17 And seeing, they understood of the word that had been spoken to them concerning this child.
18 And all that heard, wondered; and at those things that were told them by the shepherds.
19 But Mary kept all these words, pondering them in her heart. 20 And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God, for all the things they had heard and seen, as it was told unto them.
Luke 2: 1-20
Merry Christmas.
Donald Tremblay
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Sold a Bill of Goods?
My generation was taught that greed and capitalism-run-amok were responsible for the Great Depression. We were taught that the Stock Market crash was directly responsible for the eventual 20%-plus unemployment rate which plagued the country for several years during the early 1930s. Thomas Sowell refutes this notion in his latest column, “Another Great Depression?” (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/12/another_great_depression.html) Using data from Out of Work, a book written by scholars Richard Vedder and Lowell Galloway, Sowell argues that it may have been the government interventionist policies of Presidents Herbert Hoover and FDR that were truly responsible for the skyrocketing unemployment rates of the 1930s.
Sowell points out that in Nov 1929, one month after the stock market crash, the unemployment rate was 5%. In December 1929 it climbed to 9%, but then steadily decreased until it hit 6.3 percent in June 1930. It was at this time that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs were passed, which like all tariffs sought to limit imports to protect American jobs. According to Sowell just five months after the passage of these acts “the unemployment rate hit double digits for the first time in the 1930s.” From there despite government intervention, or because of government intervention as Sowell argues, the unemployment rate climbed to over 20% where it remained for nearly three years.
Not being an economist I am in no in position to argue whether Sowell’s contention is accurate or not. However, since I generally believe that when government bureaucracy gets involved in anything it tends to make matters worse, it would not surprise me if his analysis is correct. Which brings me to the current taxpayer bailout of corporate America. I understand that if these corporations tank many jobs will be lost. But are we just throwing money into an empty pit? Will the same mismanagement that bankrupted these companies waste the bailout money as well? Where does the accountability lie?
Plus, the game of politics dictates that you never agree to anything unless there is something in it for you. The people on Capitol Hill are politicians, not missionaries, which means that in exchange for approving federal handouts in any form they will expect support for their pork projects. For ex., today Las Vegas television network News 3 reports that Nevada Senator Harry Reid is looking for one billion dollars from a possible federal economic stimulus package to repair and upgrade Las Vegas roads. (http://www.kvbc.com/Global/story.asp?S=9567674) I’m sorry but you will be hard-pressed to convince me that fixing roads in Vegas somehow benefits those who have been laid off without a severance package and are relying on unemployment insurance to feed their families and pay their bills.
Something tells me that decades from now history will not look back kindly at how taxpayers dollars were spent.
Donald Tremblay
Sowell points out that in Nov 1929, one month after the stock market crash, the unemployment rate was 5%. In December 1929 it climbed to 9%, but then steadily decreased until it hit 6.3 percent in June 1930. It was at this time that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs were passed, which like all tariffs sought to limit imports to protect American jobs. According to Sowell just five months after the passage of these acts “the unemployment rate hit double digits for the first time in the 1930s.” From there despite government intervention, or because of government intervention as Sowell argues, the unemployment rate climbed to over 20% where it remained for nearly three years.
Not being an economist I am in no in position to argue whether Sowell’s contention is accurate or not. However, since I generally believe that when government bureaucracy gets involved in anything it tends to make matters worse, it would not surprise me if his analysis is correct. Which brings me to the current taxpayer bailout of corporate America. I understand that if these corporations tank many jobs will be lost. But are we just throwing money into an empty pit? Will the same mismanagement that bankrupted these companies waste the bailout money as well? Where does the accountability lie?
Plus, the game of politics dictates that you never agree to anything unless there is something in it for you. The people on Capitol Hill are politicians, not missionaries, which means that in exchange for approving federal handouts in any form they will expect support for their pork projects. For ex., today Las Vegas television network News 3 reports that Nevada Senator Harry Reid is looking for one billion dollars from a possible federal economic stimulus package to repair and upgrade Las Vegas roads. (http://www.kvbc.com/Global/story.asp?S=9567674) I’m sorry but you will be hard-pressed to convince me that fixing roads in Vegas somehow benefits those who have been laid off without a severance package and are relying on unemployment insurance to feed their families and pay their bills.
Something tells me that decades from now history will not look back kindly at how taxpayers dollars were spent.
Donald Tremblay
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
