Novus Ordo or Nothing

Novus Ordo or Nothing

Last year Pope Benedict XVI released "Summorum Pontificum”, which stated that the Tridentine Mass “should be made available in every parish where groups of the faithful desire it.” Not surprisingly, many bishops and pastors have ignored the papal directive. (http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0804776.htm)

“’We're only looking at one calendar year, and we know that in the church these things take time. But the problem -- dare anyone say this? -- the problem is the bishops. Because you have bishops who aren't on board,’ said John Paul Sonnen, an American Catholic who lives in Rome.”
Traditional Catholics should expect this intransigence to continue. After all why would the same bishops who allowed, and in some cases even encouraged, the destruction of the Latin Rite be eager to welcome it back?

Sacrosanct is how post-Vatican II changes in the Church are viewed by many in the episcopate. This is particularly true in the case of Novus Ordo. Many bishops battle opposition to Novus Ordo the way they would combat Aryanism or some other heresy. When it is not silenced by the powers-that-be, criticism about Vatican II’s implementation is met with the lame explanation that choices were made in the “spirit of Vatican II”.
The Spirit of Vatican II. How is that for an amorphous concept?

Novus Ordo is not doctrine, nor is it consistent with the liturgy as it was celebrated for many centuries prior to Vatican II. It can and should be changed. Am I advocating the complete elimination of our current liturgy? No, I do not believe that going back to the Latin Rite as it was is the answer. Even those who supported the Tridentine Mass in the first half of the 20th century acknowledged that changes to the Mass were necessary. But the refusal of many clergy to offer the Latin Rite is an indication of how little interest the current generation of bishops has in hearing the concerns of those who do not believe that Novus Ordo sufficiently honors the Lord.

Sadly, Traditional Catholics will have to wait for these bishops to retire or pass away before Pope Benedict XVI’s directive is honored worldwide.

Donald Tremblay

Religious Entertainment

Yesterday, Catholicexchange.com posted a column entitled, “Hold the Applause: Confessions of a Conflicted Clapper” (http://www.catholicexchange.com/2008/07/22/113245/) The op-ed writer says she began to question clapping at Mass after reading then-Cardinal Ratzinger’s book, The Spirit of the Liturgy, which says the following : “Whenever applause breaks out in the liturgy because of some human achievement, it is a sure sign that the essence of the liturgy has totally disappeared and been replaced by a kind of religious entertainment.” (Ratzinger, p198) Religious entertainment is something all churchgoers have had to suffer through. And because of its flawed objective the Novus Ordo mass is the main culprit behind the growing prevalence of this problem.

Following Vatican II the Church decided to “democratize” the liturgy (“Six Marks of the Novus Ordo Mass”, http://www.catholicapologetics.info/modernproblems/newmass/marks.html).They wanted increased laity participation in the Mass, so they changed the liturgy’s objective from that of a sacrifice to one of a celebration. The Traditional (Tridentine) Mass was “a sacrifice linked to the sacrifice of the Cross”, while the New (Novus Ordo) Mass is “a meal linked to the Last Supper”. (http://www.catholicapologetics.info/modernproblems/newmass/comparison.htm) The congregation became the focus of the liturgy instead of God. Need examples:

· No longer does the priest face God as he consecrates the bread and wine. Now he must face the congregation as if he is performing for the crowd, sort of like a magician at Radio City Music Hall .

· Parish Councils – Lay members in consultation with the pastor decide on the direction of the Church. In the case of the liturgy “it means that the Mass should be led not just by the priest, but by many lectors or readers taking turns, by many communion ministers, including women and even teenagers, by many ushers or so-called ministers of hospitality, and above all by a parish liturgy committee that decides the style and structure of the various Masses. The cantor or leader of song is another player on the team of the democratic liturgy.” (“Six Marks of the Novus Ordo Mass”)

And no discussion of religious entertainment would be complete without addressing the issue of Church music. Perhaps the best commentary on this disaster is my experience last week at a beach town parish. Prior to the opening of the liturgy, the pianist played a solo that must have been written by Charles Schultz since it can only be described as “Peanuts-like”. From there a set of drums, a violin, an organ, and a guitar were added. (Never did I fathom that a Responsorial Psalm could be turned into a Jazz-like tune with a drumbeat setting the rhythm). Rounding off the Twilight Zone-experience was the performances of the singers themselves. The main singer, a gentleman with a wonderful voice, felt the need to smile and gesture with his arms throughout as if he were giving an aria at Lincoln Center .

And people wonder why Mass attendance is down.

Donald Tremblay

Learn more about the Tridentine (Latin) Mass